Flood Warning expires at 8:30 PM on 5/22, issued at 2:52 AM Bunch, OK | Proctor, OK | Stilwell, OK | Watts, OK

OK to consider changing sex offender buffer zone


Story Comments Share

Reported by: Adam Paluka
Updated: 10/18/2011 2:28 pm Published: 10/14/2011 9:11 pm


Currently, the state of Oklahoma requires that all sex offenders live at least 2,000 feet from a school, park, or playground. In Tulsa there are thousands of those, so sex offenders don't have many places to live legally. That has forced them to congregate in certain parts of town. Some believe that's more dangerous than the alternative.

“Does the spacing make it safer, because where a person lives doesn't dictate where they can move,” State Representative Jeannie McDaniel, a Democrat from the 78th District in Tulsa, said.

McDaniel will over see an interim study beginning Tuesday to see if that 2,000 feet buffer should be cut in half.

“2,000 feet away, I think it helps. I don't think it protects them, I mean none of them's protected,” one Tulsa grandfather told FOX23.

But Representative McDaniel says there are problems with the way things are now.

“What we've found out is that there are very few places these people can live, which in turn then may group them all in one area.”

That's what's happened in Tulsa.
 
“I don't think it makes a huge difference, I mean you just want to keep them away and who's enforcing it,” Mom Janel Domenico said Friday.

Because it's so hard to find a place to live, many offenders break the law by not registering at all. A 16 year-old told FOX23 he does not want sex offenders close to his high school.

“I like the way things are now, I think we should just keep it like this,”

No decisions have been made and Tuesday’s discussion is just a first step, but McDaniel says safety has been and will always be priority number one.

“The goal is we need to be able to track (sex offenders), to be in dialogue with them, to make sure that they get the services they need if that's going to mean a safer community for all of us.”

The Tulsa Police Department is also voicing some support for this proposal. One sergeant in the exploitation department will speak at Tuesday’s meeting in Oklahoma City. The whole process to get the law changed could take more than a year.

“We'd have to introduce legislation, get it through a committee, get it through the house, through a senate committee, through the senate, to the governor; at the earliest anything could happen is next November first,” McDaniel said.

Story Comments Share

24 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KOKI FOX23 - Tulsa

ShellyStow - 10/22/2011 9:26 AM
1 Vote
Every time I see a proposal for a "child safety zone" or "buffer zone," I shake my head in amazement. Based on every statistic available from any and all sources about who the sexual abusers of children are, any zone that would keep potential molesters away from children and therefore provide them safety from abuse would have to be a zone that separated the children from their parents, grandparents, siblings, uncles, cousins, next door neighbors, friends' parents, grandparents, siblings....

Claire53 - 10/21/2011 7:30 PM
2 Votes
To go from 2000 feet to 1000 feet are equal absurdities. Most crimes against children happen in the home by people who have not been caught. Those who have been caught recidivate only 5.4% of the time, so you are not accomplishing anything here by reducing the buffer zone. there shouldn't be a buffer zone at all. It is idiocy. What? A true predator is not going to walk the 1000 and FIVE to a victim/ This is a ridiculous waste of money. For people who cannot appropriately handle their sexuality, I would vote for education and therapy, not this invented silliness. The assumption that sex offenders should have a buffer zone infers they all had crimes involving kids, and that is simply not the case. And by the way WATCHDOG, I am curious. How exactly do you define child pornography?

Claire53 - 10/21/2011 7:30 PM
0 Votes
To go from 2000 feet to 1000 feet are equal absurdities. Most crimes against children happen in the home by people who have not been caught. Those who have been caught recidivate only 5.4% of the time, so you are not accomplishing anything here by reducing the buffer zone. there shouldn't be a buffer zone at all. It is idiocy. What? A true predator is not going to walk the 1000 and FIVE to a victim/ This is a ridiculous waste of money. For people who cannot appropriately handle their sexuality, I would vote for education and therapy, not this invented silliness. The assumption that sex offenders should have a buffer zone infers they all had crimes involving kids, and that is simply not the case. And by the way WATCHDOG, I am curious. How exactly do you define child pornography?

TerryBogard - 10/21/2011 9:34 AM
1 Vote
They need to do away with residency laws altogether. They have proven ineffective. oncefallendotcom for the truth.

WhisperingWind - 10/20/2011 9:32 AM
2 Votes
The Public needs to be better educated before making judgements based on emotion. Just remember there is no public registry for murders, violent abusers, drug dealers or any other crimes. So how well do you know who is really living around you. Most sex offenders are not the monsters that you are made to believe they are. I agree with protecting children and I believe in protecting all children and families. These public registry have caused bullying, heartache and poverty for the children of those on the registry. The registry has also caused murders and not just of sex offenders of people who have not committed a crime (mistaken identities). How is it okay for others that have committed heinous crimes to serve their time and then be out and live their lives but it is not okay for a sex offender (who may have peed on a bush or was 17 and the gf was 15 or just made a horrible mistake served their time been through counseling and has a sound support system). The registry and residency laws definitely need to be revamped so that former SO's can become productive members of society once they have served their time. Most of these former offenders will never re-offend sexually again. There will be a small percent that will, just like any other crime. Most SO of children will be close friends and family. Our time would be better spent on building support to prevent recidivism. According to the US Department of Justice, recidivism rates vary with the definition of recidivism, but remain low. In a 3 year study tracking 9,961 released sex offenders: • 5.3% were rearrested for a new sex crime. • 3.5% were reconvicted for a new sex crime. • 24% were reconvicted for a new offense including all types of crimes. (most of these are registry issue crimes) • 2.2% were rearrested for a sex crime against a child. • 3.3% of child molesters were rearrested for a new sex crime against a child http://www.ok-rsol.org/facts-and-info.php http://www.sofarproject.com/facts-and-inf

watchdog11 - 10/18/2011 11:35 PM
0 Votes
cfaamerica, I resent your statement that if a woman reports her husband for abuse and he goes to jail that they end up on welfare, do you really believe most women are that lazy, stupid and unwilling to put forward the extra effort needed to protect and provide for their kids? You must be a very lazy, weak, dependent, needy individual with some personal experience involving family sexual abuse and I would bet you are on welfare, but for every weak woman who is willing to keep silent about her abusive relatives so they won't go to jail to insure she can hang on to her mealticket,there are 10 who are strong enough and right minded enough to do what is right to protect her innocent kids. For the record, I couldn 't care less about the idiots who pee on the sidewalk or drop their drawers in public, they are just exhibitionist and stupid, child porn should land anyone in jail for a long time, I don't worry too much about although I find them extremely repulsive, however, I would not hesitate to off someone I KNEW was a child molester, no amount of statistics, defense, explanation for the act, or flowery idealistic reasoning will ever change that, the only way to stop them is to put a bullet in their heads just like any other rabid animal. So just keep on jabber-jawing, I'm sure you all have your own personal reasons to plead the case of these disgusting cancers on society, I just pray there are no children depending on you to protect them.

cfcamerica - 10/18/2011 3:42 PM
1 Vote
NOT EVERYONE WHO IS ON THE REGISTRY RAPED! If those who are in charge would quit trying to turn a profit form Crime, ie, watch the videos PRISONS FOR PROFIT, then crime in America could be drastically reduced. Many of the laws now in place are there so Special Interest Groups can turn a profit. Follow the money, Look into the SPC, Mark Lunsford, Ed Smart, and others. Look into how the SPC, Surviving Parents Coalition takes money from SECURE ALERT, the manufacturer of GPS tracking devices.. and then uses that money to pay LOBBIESTS IN WASHINGTON to push for the widespread implementation of laws like the Adam Walsh Act, Jessica's Law.. which push for GPS TRACKING OF EX OFFENDERS.... If you want to know why lawmakers IGNORE all the professional studies that have been done showing these laws do NOT work.. but actually Harm Society.. then all you have to do is FOLLOW THE MONEY! See who is profiting from all these insane laws..It is all there. The Revolving Door of Prisons in America is a Billion Dollar Business! Why would those who are making money from ex offenders want them to STOP GOING BACK TO PRISON? Think about it! www.cfcamerica.org One more note. You take a Daddy who screws up one time.. send him to prison, he changes.. learns his lesson, swears to never again commit another crime.. he is released from prison, BRANDED WITH A MARK ON HIS HEAD sex offender! Nobody will hire him, he cannot find anyone to rent him a home... What do you think this does to his Innocent Children? I will tell you... the whole family ends up on Welfare and Food Stamps. When you brand a person Ex Felon or Sex Offender you will support him and his family for the rest of their lives... Prison or Welfare, YOU the tax payer fund both! Better is to remove the brand, help him get a job.. possibly Monitor him on Parole for some time.. but if he is doing good.. let him the he_ _ alone! Decide when you want to stop supporting the Millions who are making money for the Prison Industry in America!

cfcamerica - 10/18/2011 3:42 PM
0 Votes
NOT EVERYONE WHO IS ON THE REGISTRY RAPED! If those who are in charge would quit trying to turn a profit form Crime, ie, watch the videos PRISONS FOR PROFIT, then crime in America could be drastically reduced. Many of the laws now in place are there so Special Interest Groups can turn a profit. Follow the money, Look into the SPC, Mark Lunsford, Ed Smart, and others. Look into how the SPC, Surviving Parents Coalition takes money from SECURE ALERT, the manufacturer of GPS tracking devices.. and then uses that money to pay LOBBIESTS IN WASHINGTON to push for the widespread implementation of laws like the Adam Walsh Act, Jessica's Law.. which push for GPS TRACKING OF EX OFFENDERS.... If you want to know why lawmakers IGNORE all the professional studies that have been done showing these laws do NOT work.. but actually Harm Society.. then all you have to do is FOLLOW THE MONEY! See who is profiting from all these insane laws..It is all there. The Revolving Door of Prisons in America is a Billion Dollar Business! Why would those who are making money from ex offenders want them to STOP GOING BACK TO PRISON? Think about it! www.cfcamerica.org One more note. You take a Daddy who screws up one time.. send him to prison, he changes.. learns his lesson, swears to never again commit another crime.. he is released from prison, BRANDED WITH A MARK ON HIS HEAD sex offender! Nobody will hire him, he cannot find anyone to rent him a home... What do you think this does to his Innocent Children? I will tell you... the whole family ends up on Welfare and Food Stamps. When you brand a person Ex Felon or Sex Offender you will support him and his family for the rest of their lives... Prison or Welfare, YOU the tax payer fund both! Better is to remove the brand, help him get a job.. possibly Monitor him on Parole for some time.. but if he is doing good.. let him the he_ _ alone! Decide when you want to stop supporting the Millions who are making money for the Prison Industry in America!

yellowroselady - 10/18/2011 2:29 PM
1 Vote
Women Against Registry is working to bring awareness to the collateral damage caused to wives, mothers, children, etc. across America with total disregard for their Constitutional, Civil and Human Rights. As you may know there are over 780,000 registered men, women and children (as young as 8 and 10 in some states)on the list. That number grows daily due to the increasing "crimes" being added as registerable offenses. Urinating in public, prostitution, streaking, possession of prepubescent or teen suggestive or abusive images of anyone 17 years and under. Some teens are made-up to look of age but the law says that is “not a defense” when you don’t know the true age. Remember the folks caught in the sting operation with Perverted Justice and NBC’s To Catch a Predator? An article came out recently about the number of folks in that sensationalized program and of the 20 plus cases they mentioned the 2 that would not take a plea bargain and went to trial and were acquitted because the judge said it was entrapment. Those who took a plea, can never, ever, try to change anything about their crime or plea. Some do not know this nor do they know they will be placed on a national registry because the attorney wants them to take the plea. Then you have the Romeo & Juliet consensual dating sexual relationships where he is prosecuted, imprisoned and in some cases they get married and he is on the sex offender registry. Matt Lauer just did a program where he interviewed a man named Frankie and his wife and that was their scenario. Later in the program Matt said they had gotten the most feedback about that piece than ever before. False accusations by the soon-to-be ex-wife, angry girlfriend, spiteful student like the one in the news a few months back where the teacher would not take a plea deal,went to trial, was acquitted. All the school had to do was look on her Facebook page. He now has a $125,000 legal bill and no job. Educate yourselves. womenagainstregistry dot com

keebler111 - 10/18/2011 1:48 PM
0 Votes
then if you dont think that they will recommit the crime let them live by you or with you i dont want any by my house. and 2000 feet to me is not enough should be more .
FOX23 Weather Center
55°
Feels Like: 55°
High: 77° | Low: 54°
Partly Cloudy
Most Popular
Top Stories
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.