Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile | 
  FOX23 Weather Links:    Text Forecast | 7 Day Forecast | Weather School | Interactive Radar | Breaking Weather Guide
76° /Clear    
Untitled Document
Full
4:00AM Wendy Williams Show
5:00AM FOX23 News Daybreak
5:00PM FOX23 News at 5
5:30PM FOX23 News @ 5:30
6:00PM The Simpsons
6:30PM King of the Hill
7:00PM House
8:00PM Bones
9:00PM FOX23 News @ 9
10:00PM FOX23 News at 10
10:30PM Seinfeld
11:00PM King of Queens
11:30PM TMZ

Council Dismisses Ethics Complaint

Last Update: 2/19/2009 3:41 pm
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Print Story |
Citizens call it their right, guaranteed by the first amendment.  But one Tulsa city councilor calls it a 6-paragraph diatribe.  The investigation into alleged improprieties by two city councilors is now over.  But the public backlash has just begun.  FOX 23’s Douglas Clark has the latest on a story that he broke last week. 
 
Earlier this month, Tulsa citizen Chip Atkins made a complaint against city councilors Eric Gomez and Bill Martinson, alleging they may have profited from a real estate deal.  Councilors have now dismissed the complaint, after finding no supporting evidence, clearing the names of the councilors in question.  But citizens call the process flawed. 
 
It was a hot-button issue for Midtown residents – land targeted for redevelopment by the St. John Credit Union, which wanted to put a bank in place of houses near 13th and Lewis. 
 
But a complaint filed against City Councilors Eric Gomez and Bill Martinson charged them with accepting “compensation” from St. John, in exchange for their support of the project.  The man who wrote the complaint, Chip Atkins, now alleges only Gomez may have received money.  But he presented no evidence to support the claim.
 
“The allegation was raised by a citizen who now says, ‘I have no evidence to support the allegation and I didn’t make the allegation.  It’s a bit over the top,” says Tulsa City Council Chairman John Eagleton.
 
With no ethical or criminal breach uncovered, the investigation is now closed.
But Atkins claims he never had to present evidence, citing a 2005 ethics ordinance that says the mere appearance of impropriety can constitute an ethical violation. 
 
“There’s problems with the process here,” says Julie Hall, who runs the citizen watchdog group Who Owns Tulsa.  She says the investigation was incomplete, and criticizes the process that allows councilors to investigate each other.
Print Story |

Featured Comments
TCBTCB - 2/19/2009 2:41 PM
What about a process that allows anyone to make up anything and have it put over the airwaves? I hereby allege that Douglas Clark is a pedophile, Chip Atkins is a necrophiliac, and Julie Hall is a man. Put these on the air. I have precisely the same amount of evidence to back them up as the allegations against the councilors.



Water Cooler
Untitled Document
Auto Guide
Calculators
Calendar
Forums
Games
Gas Prices
Live Video
Lost PETS
Lottery
Movie List
MRSA
Slideshows
Spot Crime
2009 Swine Flu
AreYouAHoarder
Box Office
Current Video
Idol Archives
Haiti Earthquake
Health Guide
Lifestyle Columnists
M.Jackson Memorial
On The Road 2010
On The Road 2009
Political News
Site Comments
Environmental News
Fascinating Facts
High School Report
Living Life
OHP-EMT Stories
PortraitOfCourage
Rt66 Marathon
Sports Buzz
ThisDayInHistory
Video Archive
W.Tisdale Funeral
Weather Maps
Weird News
  This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.