City Workers React to Furlough Proposal


Story Comments Share

Updated: 4/30/2009 10:23 pm Published: 4/30/2009 7:39 pm


Let the budget battle begin.  Thursday night, Mayor Kathy Taylor presented next year’s budget proposal to the city council.  In it, she asks police officers and firefighters to make 4-day furloughs a part of next year’s contract, and other city departments may be asked to do the same.  FOX 23’s Douglas Clark has details.
 
The Mayor must have a balanced budget plan in place at the start of the fiscal year, which begins July first.  And with the city facing a $13 million budget gap, each department has been asked to cut 7% from its budget.  That could include 4-day furloughs.  Employees understand, but they’re not happy about it.
 
With Mayor Kathy Taylor flirting with the idea of forcing city workers to take four unpaid days off next year, city hall is buzzing with opinions. 
 
“I just hope they look at some other options,” says Willette Watts.
 
“I can handle it.  I’ll have to offset it with a part-time job.  I have a part-time job, so it won’t be hardship for me.  Maybe some others who have families with kids,” says another woman.
 
The idea of furloughs is not new.  One woman, who didn’t want to give her name, has worked for the city for 25 years and has been asked to take a furlough
before. 
 
“You really have no choice if you want to keep your job.  I’d rather have a furlough than be laid off.”
 
The mayor says the four-day furloughs would equate to a 1.5% pay cut for every city employee.  She estimates that would save the city about $2.5 million, money needed to offset rising expenses and shrinking revenues. 
 
My perception is that people understand,” says Tulsa employee Dave Lister.  “Cuts have to be made and if furloughs mean someone doesn’t have to lose a job, I’m for it.”
 
“I’m not overly concerned if we have a few days off because if it can stop layoffs,” says city employee Loretta Bailey.
 
But even some who understand the need for the furloughs admit they’re largely in the dark about the details.
 
“We hear things in the media and we really don’t know what’s going to happen.  but we’re not happy about it.”
 
The Mayor says the alternative to furloughs is to permanently decrease the city’s payroll by $2.5 million, which would mean eliminating additional positions and cutting core services. 
 
Right now, 96 positions would be eliminated as part of next year's budget.  Seventeen of them are currently filled.
 
Councilors can now make changes to the budget.  It goes into effect July 1st

Story Comments Share

12 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KOKI FOX23 - Tulsa

OKACO - 5/5/2009 2:43 PM
Hahahahhaa! Stop it, misfit, you're cracking me up!

misfit - 5/4/2009 12:14 AM
Ray is right. where for us to get layoffs? have this start already! bad things for people bad times. Me make wheel! Fire bad!

OKACO - 5/3/2009 11:15 AM
HUH?? What???

ray7938 - 5/2/2009 5:36 PM
i work 4 days than be layoff? this is bad timeing!for city of tulsa have do this! if mayor taylor start this 9month ago? we as city worker we know what going on for bad times on hand this we work thought this problem together as city workers we live here! ray r. tulsa

slimjim - 5/1/2009 8:20 PM
Gee OKACO, I guess we have reached the point where we don't vote FOR a candidate we vote AGAINST the lesser of the evils. Seems like we vote one out hoping things will get better and look what happens. I hope the next election we have a candidate come forward that we can vote for. Too practical ILoveEMSA

I Love EMSA - 5/1/2009 8:01 PM
If the budget is truly strained I'm sure city employees will understand the need for a decrease in pay. Can someone please explain why we wasted a fortune on a new city hall building? Why we are about to waste a fortune on a new ballpark. Why we continue to waste money in numerous ways throughout the city if the budget is so tight? How about if we plug the current holes in spending before we ask citizens to pay more utility fees and ask employees to take pay cuts? That's my rant, now here is an idea for savings. What about moving the "city work week" from five eight hour days, to four ten hour days? This should save money in operating costs.

OKACO - 5/1/2009 7:11 PM
I can...she wasn't Bill LaFortune. I don't agree with it, but that's why she was elected.

slimjim - 5/1/2009 2:17 PM
Could someone please enlighten me on what qualifications or experience the mayor had that qualified her for the office of mayor?

Willow - 5/1/2009 9:44 AM
I think that four days a year is do able, we may not like it, but we could be like the auto makers and expect someone else to fix our budget.. and we see how that's working for them. It starts at home, we as citizens need to do our own budgeting/saving. That way four days off in the next year is not going to put any of us under. Ok, lets trim some pork while we are at it.

captain1965 - 5/1/2009 3:41 AM
City of Tulsa workers will take the furloughs if the city management will stop making full payments for services "not operational" such as streetlights & security lights leased from the electric utility company. Begin collections of traffic fines unpaid. Cease maintaining infrastructure like street lighting of U.S. Interstate Highways belonging to the State of Oklahoma Department of Transportation in violation of Federal Highway Administration rules. All contractors shall have to follow all safety and statues followed by city employees. Potable water sales contracts with other cities & towns made by past Tulsa government officials prior to current mayor will force Tulsa citizens to subsidize under bid water treatment rates and distribution.
FOX23 Weather Center
38°
Feels Like: 33°
High: 38° | Low: 37°
Partly Cloudy
Top Stories
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.