Chloramine coming to Tulsa water soon


Story Comments Share

Reported by: Ian Silver
Updated: 7/11/2012 9:06 am Published: 7/11/2012 8:40 am


If you live in Tulsa or a handful of surrounding suburbs you'll soon have small amounts of a new chemical in your water.

Tulsa will soon start adding chloramine to your water as part of tighter EPA standards to kill more cancer-causing agents in the water supply.

But chloramine is a controversial chemical, and many claim it can be toxic.

Chloramine is a gas formed by mixing ammonia with chlorine. Chlorine is already used as a disinfectant in Tulsa's water supply.

"We've been using chlorine for as long as we've been treating water in Tulsa," Joan Arthur, Engineering Services for the City of Tulsa, said.

Chloramine may be new to Tulsa, but it's been used in cities like Denver and St. Louis since the 1920s and 1930s.

"It's used in Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, Oklahoma City, Norman, Sand Springs in our immediate area," Arthur said.

Last fall FOX23 News talked to Jay Fleming, who had some concerns about chloramine.

"I think the biggest concern was the lead leaching out of the pipes," Fleming said.

Several studies have indicated chloramine can break down lead in pipes, and release more of it into the water flow. But Arthur said her team has tested how chloramine would interact with lead in several different types of pipes found throughout Tulsa's water system.

"The corrosion actually was lower with the chloraminated water than it was with our existing water," Arthur said. "So, we feel that issues with household plumbing won't be a concern."

Like many, Fleming was also worried chloramine could cause serious health problems like skin irritation, respiratory problems and digestive issues. But Arthur said there isn't much validity to such claims.

"There really isn't any research that shows that chloramines used in the concentrations in drinking water have any negative effects," she said.

Concentration of ammonia is the central issue when it comes to chloramine. When people come into contact with high concentrations of ammonia those health concerns are likely to be an issue. But Arthur said the concentration the city will be inserting into the water is too small to cause a difference. In fact, she said the concentration is the equivalent of adding a teaspoon of ammonia to an Olympic sized swimming pool. That, she said, is lower than concentrations that naturally occur in the body.

"The concentration in the water is actually lower than is in perspiration, or is in a lot of just normal food products; even an apple," she said.

Many have also voiced concerns about the effects of chloramine on kidney patients undergoing dialysis. But most, if not all, dialysis clinics in the area are already prepared for those issues.

"Each dialysis facility, and specifically St. John, have excellent water purification systems," Dr. Irfan Kundi, head of the dialysis unit with St. John Medical Center, said. "And our water purification systems test for both chlorine and chloramine. And we've been doing it from day one."

"If the [tests] do turn positive, which has not happened, we don't dialyze those patients and we move them to a different dialysis facility."

Fleming said after doing his own research, his fears and concerns about chloramine have largely dissipated. In fact, he said he thinks many of the alarming information about chloramine he found online appears to have come from sources with a vested interest.

"A lot of it was hype in order to line pockets of attorneys just so they could have lawsuits," he said.

He now says he has complete faith in Arthur and the decisions her department has made regarding chloramine.

"I don't see why she would put her own family at risk and why she would put someone else's family at risk," he said.

One group that will need to take extra protective measures against chloramine is those who keep fish tanks or fish ponds. Chloramine can be toxic to fish. But most pet stores sell chemicals fish owners can use to treat the water that neutralize the chloramine.

The city's water department is running final tests on the ammonia injection system, but chloramine will be flowing through faucets by the end of July.







Story Comments Share

5 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KOKI FOX23 - Tulsa

watersquaw - 7/17/2012 10:35 PM
0 Votes
This whole article is a big spun piece of cr*p. But I'll pick out just one sentence: ""There really isn't any research that shows that chloramines used in the concentrations in drinking water have any negative effects," she said. " ARE YOU KIDDING???? This line comes from central casting. All the officials who are pushing this poison down peoples' throats ALL OVER THE U.S. are saying it. And you know da*n well, Miz Arthur, that there ARE NO STUDIES. It happened in my water district and a TON of other ones, too. You Tulsa officials are sickening. Get the real truth at chloramine.org. To about 30% of you Tulsans: get ready to suffer from the following. RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS sinus and nasal congestion sneezing coughing choking wheezing life-threatening asthma-like symptoms bronchial and emphysema-like symptoms SKIN SYMPTOMS rashes and red burning skin intense itching dry, chapping, flaking, cracking skin welts and blistering skin with scarring and pigmentation peeling, bleeding lips, dry mouth and throat dry eyes DIGESTIVE DISORDER SYMPTOMS irritable bowel symptoms-like reactions (IBS) acid reflux-like symptoms

linda - 7/17/2012 6:02 PM
0 Votes
This article contains so much spin, I got dizzy reading it. Touting the use of chloramine in other cities is not science. For instance, Denver began using chloramine at a very low level, but when they increased the level of chloramine recently, they began getting health complaints. What would it take for Joan Arthur to validate the health "claims" of people who are adversly affected by chloramine? We know that if we are exposed to chloramine, we develop specific symptoms. No chloramine - no symptoms. Development of symptoms can be traced back to an accidental exposure. Her comment that there isn't any research that shows that chloramines used in drinking water have any negative(I'm assuming she means health effects here) effects is just as false as it is true. The real fact is that there is no research on the affects of chloramine on the human body relating to the symptoms people are developing. We could say, There is no research saying that chloramine, when used in drinking water, does not cause the health effects people are experiencing. Comparing ammonia to chloramine is not accurate. Chloramine is its own, separate chemical with its own properties. This comment shows that not much is known about chloramine itself. Ms Arthur might as well try to tell us about the properties of hydrogen or oxygen when trying to describe water. Mr. Fleming's comments about alarming information on chloramine being hype in order to line the pockets of attorneys is a total falsehood. Any attorney who has worked on behalf of those who suffer from the affects of chloramine, have done so on their own time, with their own money. The anti chloramine groups are regular citizens who cannot afford to pay attorneys. The only vested interest these groups have is to try to make other citizens aware of the life altering, adverse health affects that have come to every area that has changed to chloramine whether the water agency will admit it or not. See the "hype" at www.chloramine.org.

aleman - 7/14/2012 1:07 PM
0 Votes
Nope your both wrong betcha some one high up is making a buck ot two off it.

Justice - 7/13/2012 9:30 AM
0 Votes
Better go check your facts, FOX. The EPA has research on their site that says the unregulated products of chloramine are "highly genotoxic. The assurance of safety is only for regulated byproducts, NOT the unregulated ones. Expect chloramine to be the next thalidomide, lead paint, or asbestos-the fact that it been used DOESN"T make it safe! In spite of the slick campaign to assure us that chloramines are safe and have been used for 90 years, Chloramine use has become extremely controversial-not by people with "vested interests" as your piece of fiction states. It is already banned in at least one state and other cities are rejecting it. Go read the current news stories from places like Virginia, Vermont, etc. The TMUA, a board composed of the mayor and 6 unelected people, have completely ignored the recommendations that the nationally renowned water expert, Bob Bowcock presented to Tulsa for a SAFE, effective and affordable option for Tulsa to meet the new EPA water guidelines. The TMUA chose to use chloramine instead, in spite of public outcry and new information about the dangers of chloramine. While the TMUA assures us that chlroamine is safe, it is known to damage health and property. Current research is showing that the unregluated byproducts of chlroamine damages DNA, cells, is carcinogenic and has multiple adverse health affects. It is know to leach lead into the water. Chloramine cannot be boiled out, distilled out or evaporated out and filters like reverse osmosis won't remove it!

Libertarian - 7/12/2012 2:30 PM
0 Votes
Well isn't this just GREAT! I'll bet the EPA has their ditry little fingers all over this latest attempt to poison us!
FOX23 Weather Center
76°
Feels Like: 76°
High: 93° | Low: 66°
Partly Cloudy
Top Stories
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.